Quoting Rausch:
Quote:
Oh hi there, I'm the OP and my name is Jay.
Hi Jay, this is a nice thread you have here.
Let's look at what we know for sure: Mitsu, and pretty much anyone else in the known world recommends that tires are replaced on AWD cars as a set, not in pairs. We have all heard the "Don't mix tires" statements as well. Let's just assume that there is something behind these statements. The question now becomes how finite do we need to be?
Race cars can run pretty much whatever they want, within reason, as they are designed with a given limited lifespan. In this case I would imagine that a relatively small difference would not be catastrophic, but the further you go the more the VCU will most likely hate you. I would image that this can be extrapolated to a point of failure. Unfortunately, I really have no idea what the limit really is. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif
Edit:
click Little VCU reading for your life. For fun..
The replace all tires as a set idea was because of tread depth I thought. That would throw off the diameter equation and could "potentially" harm the drive line. Now I rode around for 3 years on es100s and sumitomo's combined and they had competely different sidewalls and pattern. It was when the car was daily driven and no issues presented themselves then.
Jon, I bet that 600 hp road race car has a hot gearbox after that kind of racing! I just think that if anything broke on it, that car would kind of be a bad example. The street cars I have seen doing it haven't have any catastrophes. My car is driven a couple times a month and not very hard on the street. If it goes to a track it will be towed. I'll do the string test then I'll roll around on the set for a few days and see if I feel anything different at all. I doubt I will but that would be a good tester.
Here is a nice awd is250 that did the same width tire and the string test. 8.5 up front and 9.5 in the back