I'm with you Jon. I'm saying that Mark's assessment that the bent rod caused piston damage caused head gasket damage and subsequent failure does not lead to a diagnosis of root cause for the bent rod in the first place.
Not being familiar with these rods nor their beam design, it still seems weird to me to bend in that plane. The forces in that direction are minimal in my understanding when compared to the plane perpendicular to that. The piston travel in that direction is of course restrained by the cylinder wall, and the big end by the crank. Crank moving around?
Quoting BarnesMobile:
Quoting iceman69510:
That doesn't explain root cause of the rod bending in the first place.
I'm just saying that's what would have caused the rod to deform that way. I'm not saying what caused that pressure. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif
Not being familiar with these rods nor their beam design, it still seems weird to me to bend in that plane. The forces in that direction are minimal in my understanding when compared to the plane perpendicular to that. The piston travel in that direction is of course restrained by the cylinder wall, and the big end by the crank. Crank moving around?
Quoting BarnesMobile:
Quoting iceman69510:
That doesn't explain root cause of the rod bending in the first place.
I'm just saying that's what would have caused the rod to deform that way. I'm not saying what caused that pressure. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif