desant78
Well-known member
It was 4 years ago when I bought my ACT 2600 kit new, and I swear I had a small paper insert that said "extended slave required"
I just did a quick search, and the vendors who sell the rod claim it is needed for the 2100 to 2600 ACT set ups due to poor disengagement issues.
click
But then again, they are selling it! From my experience, I had a new master, slave, and ACT clutch kit installed at once. Once I adjusted the pedal to factory setting, the adjustment on the Master Cylinder was almost maxxed out, with 3 or 4 threads showing (don't quote me on threads). So without the extended the rod I'm not sure how well it would have worked.
With my set up, the car shifted beautifully. I also found a few random DSMtuners threads that say it's a must to use the rod, but nothing from actually ACT. Though the rod I use is from ACT to be used with there kits, nothing says it won't work without it. (Granted, this was a 5 min google search). Both ways, if you haven't tried the extended rod with the new master cylinder, I think it would be worth a shot, IMHO.
Good luck!
I just did a quick search, and the vendors who sell the rod claim it is needed for the 2100 to 2600 ACT set ups due to poor disengagement issues.
click
But then again, they are selling it! From my experience, I had a new master, slave, and ACT clutch kit installed at once. Once I adjusted the pedal to factory setting, the adjustment on the Master Cylinder was almost maxxed out, with 3 or 4 threads showing (don't quote me on threads). So without the extended the rod I'm not sure how well it would have worked.
With my set up, the car shifted beautifully. I also found a few random DSMtuners threads that say it's a must to use the rod, but nothing from actually ACT. Though the rod I use is from ACT to be used with there kits, nothing says it won't work without it. (Granted, this was a 5 min google search). Both ways, if you haven't tried the extended rod with the new master cylinder, I think it would be worth a shot, IMHO.
Good luck!