Notable differences with non turbo engine are as follows:
As stated previously, non turbo Injectors are inadequate.
It was stated earlier that the rods may not hold up to boost/abuse. This is false. Rods are the same. Of course, detonation hurts more than just pistons and heads. It also makes the bearings take a severe beating.
Pistons will have higher compression. This is not an issue. However, the fact that the ring lands are MUCH weaker will be an issue. I tried running non-turbo pistons for a cheap way to run higher compression, once. I do not recommend this. EVER. I have photos somewhere of the pistons i took out of that engine. The ring lands FELL OUT when they came out of the bores. All 4 pistons.
Oil squirters are not present. They're not essential.
Cams for non turbo cars aren't so great for turbo applications. Everything else in the head will work fine.
Outside the engine, you'll run into a host of other issues, primarily with the wiring. There's the lack of knock sensor, a single wire O2 sensor, and different MAF setup. The radiator in a N/A car does not have the increased cooling capacity the turbo models do, either.
Does anyone know for certain of the GGSX runs low or high impedance injectors? I'm not sure. That may be another concern.
The W5M31 (Stock GGSX) gearset is incredibly weak. If you saw one next to a W5M33 (DSM/VR4) gearset, you'd understand. The teeth are really small in comparison. The bearings are different. It's not really suitable to be built to handle any sort of power. The final drive in the trans is different, as is the rear diff ratio. Transfer case is the same ratio, however.
If you plan on tearing the car down and doing a full build up of it, then sure, maybe the GGSX would be a good platform. You'll need a 4 bolt rear anyway, so why not get a built W5M33 transmission too? Work on putting in the proper wiring, ecu, and other pieces, and it would be no less a VR4 than any other with deleted 4WS.