NateCrisman
Well-known member
Quoting broxma:
Do you have some idea as to what kind of realistic power numbers the car is laying down at that boost level?
How is boost holding on the top end of almost 9K rpm and do you think a 2.0L or 2.1L would be better?
/brox
Boost level is totally flat from the launch to the traps (assuming he doesn't lift throttle). The turbo seems to hold 40psi to 9000rpm with ease. (indicating we aren't near maxing it out yet for airflow). Watch the video and pause it when it shows the DSMlink screen captures. there's lots of info there if you feel like noticing it!
I think a 2.1 or 2.0L would elevate one of the major problems with a GVR4: we can't fit a taller tire because the wheel wells are too small. So we are up against an RPM limit in 3rd gear where if we want to run more MPH, we have to run more engine rpm. The 26" tall tires are doing 144mph at about 8900rpm which is getting sketchy for a 2.3L stroker. Really, I wish we could fit 28" or even 30" tall tires under the car, but the GVR4 body is meant for dinky rubber. (this is an advantage for a 1G car). If we went to a 2.0L bottom end and set it up to rev to 9500-10k, we wouldn't be worrying about gearing as much. But on the other hand, the car wouldn't get up on the converter as well and might not 60' as well because it wouldn't make as much torque as early. This combo obviously hammers out of the hole ....it got a 1.3 60' spinning the tires and sideways! I'd hate to think of changing the bottom end and screwing that up.
Do you have some idea as to what kind of realistic power numbers the car is laying down at that boost level?
How is boost holding on the top end of almost 9K rpm and do you think a 2.0L or 2.1L would be better?
/brox
Boost level is totally flat from the launch to the traps (assuming he doesn't lift throttle). The turbo seems to hold 40psi to 9000rpm with ease. (indicating we aren't near maxing it out yet for airflow). Watch the video and pause it when it shows the DSMlink screen captures. there's lots of info there if you feel like noticing it!
I think a 2.1 or 2.0L would elevate one of the major problems with a GVR4: we can't fit a taller tire because the wheel wells are too small. So we are up against an RPM limit in 3rd gear where if we want to run more MPH, we have to run more engine rpm. The 26" tall tires are doing 144mph at about 8900rpm which is getting sketchy for a 2.3L stroker. Really, I wish we could fit 28" or even 30" tall tires under the car, but the GVR4 body is meant for dinky rubber. (this is an advantage for a 1G car). If we went to a 2.0L bottom end and set it up to rev to 9500-10k, we wouldn't be worrying about gearing as much. But on the other hand, the car wouldn't get up on the converter as well and might not 60' as well because it wouldn't make as much torque as early. This combo obviously hammers out of the hole ....it got a 1.3 60' spinning the tires and sideways! I'd hate to think of changing the bottom end and screwing that up.
Last edited: