VR_IV_MR
Well-known member
and the problem is I am still confused about certain things. I have read countless threads on any topic I could think of and have emailed numerous vendors/gurus/gearheads/friends/mechanics about things that I needed clarification on. I am at a point where certain details of my build have to be ironed out, but for the most part I have a good idea of what i want 591/2k to be. I have been acquiring parts and doing minor and major maintenance things to the car over the past few years, but this year I am going to go a little crazy. Im sorry if my thoughts jump around.
So I am 100% certain I want to switch to automatic trans. The question becomes 1g or 2g auto trans-- as of right now it seems 1g is the easier way out especially since I have seen a few members on here with a 1g auto in their galant. However I have read that the 2g auto is better, but I don't feel like looking for that thread right now. I think the decision is going to come down to the aftermarket support for the converters. Just mentioning it so I remember to check on this later.
I plan on running the Borg Warner EFR 8374 turbo with twin Tial 44mm wastegates and the 1.05 AR. A 4" intake pipe into the 4" compressor inlet. 2.5" compressor outlet direct to 2.5" intercooler piping, through a q45 throttle body and the magnus v3 cast intake manifold. GSC S2 cams. JMF top mount divided exhaust manifold, 3" vband from turbine outlet all the way through to the 3" muffler tip. I will be running 93 octane to start. Eventually I MIGHT run 93+meth, or e85, but that is for the future to tell.
When it comes to the engine build I have two options in mind. My goal is to create an engine/turbo setup that will NOT need juice to get up on the stall, hence the 2 stroker options here:
Eagle 94mm crank
Manley 150mm TT rods
CP 94mm stroker pistons 9.0:1
or
Eagle 100mm crank
Manley 150mm TT rods
Wiseco 1400HD pistons 10.0:1
With the 94mm setup I am stuck with a 9.0:1 compression ratio whereas with the 2.3L kit ups it to 10:1. Now what concerns me about the CP setup is that the CP pistons will not be as forgiving as the proven wiseco pistons. The only thing that makes me lean towards the CP setup is the better rod ratio for less stress on the internals. So what would be better (performance aside)... less stress on internals, or stronger pistons? Would the CP setup last longer given everything is ok due to the better rod ratio? On the other hand will the CP fail faster if I happen to have a tuning error? Having gone through two engines already, the reputation that the HD wiseco's have of being able to withstand abuse is attractive, I could care less about saving a few grams on my pistons. However I don't want an engine that is only going to last 40k miles. What is the life expectancy on these stroker engines anyway? I can only find threads from 2002 about this which must be outdated.
Is a Walbro 400lph and FIC Bluemax 1650's good enough for this setup with 93 octane? with e85?
This will be tuned on speed density with ecmlink v3.
Would 1.25" diameter runners in the exhaust manifold make sense in this application to help build pressure on the converter when launching, or will these smaller runners hurt this turbo up top too much?
So I am 100% certain I want to switch to automatic trans. The question becomes 1g or 2g auto trans-- as of right now it seems 1g is the easier way out especially since I have seen a few members on here with a 1g auto in their galant. However I have read that the 2g auto is better, but I don't feel like looking for that thread right now. I think the decision is going to come down to the aftermarket support for the converters. Just mentioning it so I remember to check on this later.
I plan on running the Borg Warner EFR 8374 turbo with twin Tial 44mm wastegates and the 1.05 AR. A 4" intake pipe into the 4" compressor inlet. 2.5" compressor outlet direct to 2.5" intercooler piping, through a q45 throttle body and the magnus v3 cast intake manifold. GSC S2 cams. JMF top mount divided exhaust manifold, 3" vband from turbine outlet all the way through to the 3" muffler tip. I will be running 93 octane to start. Eventually I MIGHT run 93+meth, or e85, but that is for the future to tell.
When it comes to the engine build I have two options in mind. My goal is to create an engine/turbo setup that will NOT need juice to get up on the stall, hence the 2 stroker options here:
Eagle 94mm crank
Manley 150mm TT rods
CP 94mm stroker pistons 9.0:1
or
Eagle 100mm crank
Manley 150mm TT rods
Wiseco 1400HD pistons 10.0:1
With the 94mm setup I am stuck with a 9.0:1 compression ratio whereas with the 2.3L kit ups it to 10:1. Now what concerns me about the CP setup is that the CP pistons will not be as forgiving as the proven wiseco pistons. The only thing that makes me lean towards the CP setup is the better rod ratio for less stress on the internals. So what would be better (performance aside)... less stress on internals, or stronger pistons? Would the CP setup last longer given everything is ok due to the better rod ratio? On the other hand will the CP fail faster if I happen to have a tuning error? Having gone through two engines already, the reputation that the HD wiseco's have of being able to withstand abuse is attractive, I could care less about saving a few grams on my pistons. However I don't want an engine that is only going to last 40k miles. What is the life expectancy on these stroker engines anyway? I can only find threads from 2002 about this which must be outdated.
Is a Walbro 400lph and FIC Bluemax 1650's good enough for this setup with 93 octane? with e85?
This will be tuned on speed density with ecmlink v3.
Would 1.25" diameter runners in the exhaust manifold make sense in this application to help build pressure on the converter when launching, or will these smaller runners hurt this turbo up top too much?